Good argument but its nothing but that, an argument, and doesnt stand up against actual scientific rigor and is based on fallacious appeals to emotion to justify a position that is apposed to the one that, on paper, saves lives.
Pat yourself on the back, you made a great argument for a stupid position.
Lots of meta-analysis here will trump most science-based anti-mask arguments:
you cited some really bad studies that you definitely found through a biased search.
Here are peer-reviewed studies with actual declarations of bias that contradict your assessment of masks as being ineffective:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8084286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326209/
Good argument but its nothing but that, an argument, and doesnt stand up against actual scientific rigor and is based on fallacious appeals to emotion to justify a position that is apposed to the one that, on paper, saves lives.
Pat yourself on the back, you made a great argument for a stupid position.
Lots of meta-analysis here will trump most science-based anti-mask arguments:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314268/